Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Ambiguation"
(New Section: Example) |
m (Pick one artcile and it is probably disambiguated for no real reason.) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Can you give a brief example maybe?<br> | Can you give a brief example maybe?<br> | ||
--[[Contributor name:SentryRaven|SentryRaven]] 09:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | --[[Contributor name:SentryRaven|SentryRaven]] 09:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sure, like [[SentryRaven (Character)]] or [[Salvaging (Guide)]] or [[Mining (Guide)]] or just about any article in the wiki at the moment about characters, corporations or ships. | ||
| + | Some rough estimate would be that 50 to 85% of all articles could be tagged with this as for some reason there is way too agressive disambiguation resulting to articles that are disambiguation when there is no other articles with the same name. | ||
| + | Articels should not be disambiguated, when ever possible to ensure good accessability and overall smoothness of wiki use. In EVElopedia this critical point of wikimedia has been widely ignored/violated, as result of the sysop sided (en)forcing. | ||
| + | [[Contributor name:BlackSmith Sisunautti|BlackSmith Sisunautti]] 12:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:05, 11 March 2009
Example
It might be just me, but reading the description, I can't think of what pages this would refer to.
Can you give a brief example maybe?
--SentryRaven 09:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Sure, like SentryRaven (Character) or Salvaging (Guide) or Mining (Guide) or just about any article in the wiki at the moment about characters, corporations or ships. Some rough estimate would be that 50 to 85% of all articles could be tagged with this as for some reason there is way too agressive disambiguation resulting to articles that are disambiguation when there is no other articles with the same name. Articels should not be disambiguated, when ever possible to ensure good accessability and overall smoothness of wiki use. In EVElopedia this critical point of wikimedia has been widely ignored/violated, as result of the sysop sided (en)forcing. BlackSmith Sisunautti 12:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)