Talk:Khanid II
that would be my version.... I have updated some links... and add some references... so that is more like the Jamyl I page. Plz update the page so... that the template is in use.. if is something wrong just add here on this page a answer. I will try to look over here from time to time.
P.S. I havent copy the categorys because.. they would show up.... of course they stay the same.
--JR 15:24, 23.12.2011 (CET)
P.P.S. I have had some more infos.
Thanks for the update. Your version looks pretty good, so we'll have a Mercury member review the official one and update accordingly.--CCP Abraxas 12:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Thx for the kind words... And it would be good if a native english speaker looks over the text, because Im not a nativ speaker... --JR 0:59, 19.1.2012 (CET)
I have take out the WIP template.....So thats would be my Final version... plz update the page.... I would be awesome ...if the template would be in use.... and the "new" infos would be out. 23035 AD (because the Dakos page has the old split date 22762 AD - 22754 AD = 8 years... so for the new split date 23041 AD - 8 years = 23033 AD) --JR 20:25, 10.4.2012 (CET)
I have add the link to the Amarr emperor page... an rework the text a little.
--JR 04:19, 14 April 2012 (GMT)
http://backstage.eve-inspiracy.com/index.php?topic=3400.msg53418#msg53418 < CCP Abraxes please
I'm too swamped to do a proper port of this, but it's an excellent effort, so I'm going to get Mercury to review it for me :-) Note that the only reason we can consider a player submission like this is that it's very well sourced - we wouldn't be able to accept them if they had just been made up from scratch--CCP Abraxas 15:09, 18 July 2012 (GMT)
Update to the above: We've got a version ready for porting and will do so soon. However, please note that according to the hard-working volunteer who reviewed it, there was quite a bit of essay-style dissection (including digressions) about Khanid II, instead of sticking to the facts. Which is perfectly fine if you're working on your own page about something canonical, but we're going to try to avoid it as much as possible when we're incorporating player changes to official pages. (We're also link only to other Fiction Portal pages.) Just something to keep in mind if you want to draw our attention to discussions on other pages - we welcome factual fixes, but anything beyond that is likely not going to get approved :-) --CCP Abraxas 16:34, 20 July 2012 (GMT)
A misleading typo has crept in. The term "Reunification", which is in use on this page (ones as header), is a little misleading. As can be seen in this discussion: here. I would make the suggestion to change that term to "Reconciliation". Reason: -The term "Reconciliation" is more used (see here), as the term ""Reunification" (see here). -The term "Reconciliation" was first used as can be seen in the Year_YC111_June page, made by CCP Ginger. Which used the term first (see here). -The term "Reconciliation" is less misleading and less misinterpretation are happening with it.
As well as I like a change in the phrase "empress of all Amarr" to "empress of Amarr". Reason: -The news article speaks just of "empress of Amarr" (see here).
--PV 13:41, 04. Feb 2013 (CET)
"Reunification" approved and changed, and "all" removed. Thanks!--CCP Abraxas 15:50, 8 February 2013 (GMT)