CSM Meeting Minutes 4.009 raw log

CSM Meeting Minutes 4.009 raw log

[ 2010.04.11 17:17:02 ] ElvenLord > ===========================================This meeting is officially starting
[ 2010.04.11 17:17:09 ] ElvenLord > on agenda we have
[ 2010.04.11 17:17:31 ] ElvenLord > 1. Experimental Gallente storyline missions2. End ghost (unpaid account) datacore production3. Sources of Mineral Investigation4. Contract Login Update Notification5. View ship fittings in hanger without boarding ship
[ 2010.04.11 17:17:47 ] TeaDaze > x up those who are here
[ 2010.04.11 17:17:50 ] TeaDaze > X
[ 2010.04.11 17:17:52 ] Song Li > x
[ 2010.04.11 17:17:55 ] ElvenLord > x
[ 2010.04.11 17:17:58 ] Korvin > E
[ 2010.04.11 17:18:02 ] Sokratesz > x
[ 2010.04.11 17:18:22 ] T'Amber > x
[ 2010.04.11 17:18:28 ] Mrs Trzzbk > x
[ 2010.04.11 17:19:26 ] TeaDaze > Z0D?
[ 2010.04.11 17:19:36 ] ElvenLord > he was here a min ago
[ 2010.04.11 17:21:04 ] ElvenLord > we have 7 active so we can start
[ 2010.04.11 17:21:12 ] ElvenLord > Z0d will join in
[ 2010.04.11 17:21:28 ] ElvenLord > ===============
[ 2010.04.11 17:21:29 ] ElvenLord > 1. Experimental Gallente storyline missions
[ 2010.04.11 17:21:30 ] TeaDaze > http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Experimental_Gallente_storyline_missions_%28CSM%29
[ 2010.04.11 17:21:53 ] ElvenLord > TD you have the floor if you would like to add anything
[ 2010.04.11 17:22:29 ] TeaDaze > Raised this as described by the Assembly Hall thread - I have no first hand knowledge of these missions
[ 2010.04.11 17:22:58 ] ElvenLord > Zastrow has entered the building
[ 2010.04.11 17:23:08 ] T'Amber > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:23:10 ] TeaDaze > However, I wonder if instead of removing them there could be a choice of this (with significantly buffed reward) or a standard storyline mission [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:23:10 ] Mrs Trzzbk > ignore him
[ 2010.04.11 17:23:13 ] Zastrow > hi
[ 2010.04.11 17:23:25 ] Mrs Trzzbk > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:23:39 ] ElvenLord > Mrs Trzzbk go
[ 2010.04.11 17:24:03 ] Mrs Trzzbk > I have never run these but it seems like the main problem is that pirates always know where people are going to end up?
[ 2010.04.11 17:24:12 ] Mrs Trzzbk > it seems like sending mission runners into lowsec is a good thing
[ 2010.04.11 17:24:17 ] Mrs Trzzbk > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:24:25 ] TeaDaze > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:24:26 ] ElvenLord > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:24:31 ] ElvenLord > ElvenLord
[ 2010.04.11 17:24:42 ] T'Amber > (skipped me) Does anyone have first hand experience with this topic? [/end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:25:12 ] ElvenLord > I did run to those missions few times
[ 2010.04.11 17:25:28 ] ElvenLord > and I dont find them that dangerous, but then again I play a long time
[ 2010.04.11 17:25:51 ] ElvenLord > I agree with TD that maybe boosting the reward on them might be a good idea
[ 2010.04.11 17:26:01 ] ElvenLord > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:26:03 ] T'Amber > +1
[ 2010.04.11 17:26:13 ] ElvenLord > TeaDaze go
[ 2010.04.11 17:26:14 ] TeaDaze > Apparently the agents are also tens of jumps away from the normal mission agent, though I have seen this with standard caldari storylines too, so that is not unique to these
[ 2010.04.11 17:26:19 ] Z0D > !just made it home
[ 2010.04.11 17:26:49 ] TeaDaze > I suggest CCP use the mission branching system (or similar) to allow a boring safe courier storyline, or a buffed reward into lowsec offer [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:26:58 ] ElvenLord > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:27:52 ] ElvenLord > I dont find location of storyline agents a problem as one storyline agent services several diferent agents of different lvl in the region
[ 2010.04.11 17:28:07 ] ElvenLord > and you dont get storyline missions that often
[ 2010.04.11 17:28:11 ] ElvenLord > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:28:14 ] Song Li > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:28:21 ] ElvenLord > Song Li go
[ 2010.04.11 17:28:45 ] Song Li > The location of hte agents really shouldn't be a big problem. Even if they're far away.. it's not like missions stop and you have to complete it right away, you have a week to accept.
[ 2010.04.11 17:29:21 ] Song Li > Issues with going to low sec meh. I agree with TD that a branch implimentation sounds good. Increase payout for low sec, give a cheap high sec alt..
[ 2010.04.11 17:29:24 ] Song Li > [end
[ 2010.04.11 17:30:00 ] ElvenLord > ok, can we vote on ammended proposal (boost of reward)?
[ 2010.04.11 17:30:25 ] TeaDaze > With branching so there is a safer option too?
[ 2010.04.11 17:30:45 ] ElvenLord > as 2 solutions
[ 2010.04.11 17:30:47 ] TeaDaze > You then have risk vs reward choice
[ 2010.04.11 17:31:38 ] ElvenLord > ok, lets vote on amended proposal, (boostr of reward for lowsec missions and branching) Y or N
[ 2010.04.11 17:31:41 ] ElvenLord > =============================
[ 2010.04.11 17:31:42 ] ElvenLord > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:31:43 ] TeaDaze > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:31:45 ] Sokratesz > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:31:52 ] Sokratesz > I have to reboot back in 2 sec.
[ 2010.04.11 17:32:08 ] Song Li > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:32:27 ] Z0D > Y (with rewards and alt boring branching)
[ 2010.04.11 17:32:28 ] T'Amber > [y] If my vote is needed.
[ 2010.04.11 17:33:05 ] Mrs Trzzbk > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:33:19 ] Korvin > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:33:50 ] TeaDaze > Passed 7 for - anyone else?
[ 2010.04.11 17:34:10 ] ElvenLord > Aleks and zastrow are to vote
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:12 ] Zastrow > i missed a lot of the discussion
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:28 ] Zastrow > but whatever i trust my big jew friend ill vote with him
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:34 ] ElvenLord > storyline missions taking noobs into low sec
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:43 ] Zastrow > sure yeah go hog wild
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:43 ] T'Amber > ;)
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:44 ] TeaDaze > Aleks is offline, will take T'Amber's vote instead
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:44 ] ElvenLord > so just writte Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:35:52 ] Sokratesz > back
[ 2010.04.11 17:36:39 ] ElvenLord > so its Y from zas "Zastrow > sure yeah go hog wild"
[ 2010.04.11 17:36:41 ] TeaDaze > Passed 9 for
[ 2010.04.11 17:36:42 ] Song Li > Mercs.. so unreliable
[ 2010.04.11 17:36:43 ] ElvenLord > thats 8 for
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:11 ] ElvenLord > pardon 9
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:28 ] TeaDaze > Go go gadget Alternative voter ;)
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:36 ] Alekseyev Karrde > here!
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:38 ] ElvenLord > yup
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:47 ] Alekseyev Karrde > sry, overslept
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:48 ] Mrs Trzzbk > Aleks is too busy trying to figure out how to use the station management screen
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:48 ] T'Amber > :|
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:55 ] T'Amber > lols
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:55 ] Alekseyev Karrde > heheeh
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:55 ] TeaDaze > Ha
[ 2010.04.11 17:37:59 ] ElvenLord > motion passed 9 for, 0 against
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:02 ] ElvenLord > ====================
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:08 ] Song Li > Overslept?
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:14 ] Song Li > I'ts 1 in the afternoon there
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:17 ] ElvenLord > NEXT: 2. End ghost (unpaid account) datacore production
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:18 ] TeaDaze > http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/End_ghost_%28unpaid_account%29_datacore_production_%28CSM%29
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:20 ] Mrs Trzzbk > it's sunday
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:24 ] Mrs Trzzbk > sunday is for sleeping until 3
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:31 ] T'Amber > 7am monday here
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:35 ] Mrs Trzzbk > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:40 ] Zastrow > i just flooded my dwarf fortress
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:40 ] Alekseyev Karrde > <--up to 4:30 anchoring tcu
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:45 ] ElvenLord > Mrs Trzzbk go
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:56 ] Mrs Trzzbk > I'm pretty sure this change means I make more money so I am all for it.
[ 2010.04.11 17:38:58 ] Mrs Trzzbk > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:39:02 ] Korvin > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:39:08 ] ElvenLord > Korvin go
[ 2010.04.11 17:39:10 ] ElvenLord > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:39:17 ] T'Amber > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:39:38 ] Korvin > *Removed due to NDA*
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:11 ] ElvenLord > *Removed due to NDA*
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:12 ] Korvin > and ccp liked this idea afaik
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:18 ] TeaDaze > (Not sure how public that was though)
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:27 ] Sokratesz > yeah noah liked that very much
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:34 ] Song Li > I don't think it's public at all
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:41 ] T'Amber > it is now lols.
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:43 ] ElvenLord > TD these last comments do not go in meeting minutes :D
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:46 ] Song Li > Just means more work for TD to delete ;-)
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:50 ] T'Amber > hehe
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:54 ] ElvenLord > *Removed due to NDA*
[ 2010.04.11 17:40:55 ] Mrs Trzzbk > i want my free money
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:00 ] Korvin > well, we can cut it down, if its not
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:16 ] Korvin > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:19 ] TeaDaze > *Removed due to NDA*
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:28 ] Alekseyev Karrde > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:34 ] Z0D > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:45 ] T'Amber > *Removed due to NDA*
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:49 ] ElvenLord > its not in summit meeting minutes so this can not go in minutes from this meeting
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:53 ] ElvenLord > @ TD
[ 2010.04.11 17:41:57 ] TeaDaze > Understood
[ 2010.04.11 17:42:04 ] ElvenLord > me now
[ 2010.04.11 17:42:32 ] ElvenLord > I wounder why they didnt kill this with ghost training, but for one I welcome this proposal [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:42:37 ] Sokratesz > ye
[ 2010.04.11 17:42:41 ] ElvenLord > T'Amber go
[ 2010.04.11 17:42:59 ] ElvenLord > *wonder
[ 2010.04.11 17:43:01 ] T'Amber > I think this is pretty simple and you can priobably vote now. [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:43:12 ] ElvenLord > Alekseyev Karrde go
[ 2010.04.11 17:43:32 ] Alekseyev Karrde > *Removed due to NDA*
[ 2010.04.11 17:43:59 ] ElvenLord > Z0D go
[ 2010.04.11 17:44:02 ] Z0D > as much as some would like to get free stuff for nothing and in same way as with skills not training while account is not paid for, datacores farming should not accumulate during that period
[ 2010.04.11 17:44:11 ] TeaDaze > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:44:17 ] Z0D > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:44:18 ] ElvenLord > TeaDaze go
[ 2010.04.11 17:44:48 ] TeaDaze > *Removed due to NDA*
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:45 ] ElvenLord > lets go for a vote on proposal as it is and as things stand now
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:47 ] ElvenLord > Y or N pls
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:50 ] ElvenLord > =======================
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:51 ] ElvenLord > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:52 ] Korvin > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:53 ] Zastrow > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:53 ] Alekseyev Karrde > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:45:58 ] Z0D > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:01 ] TeaDaze > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:06 ] Mrs Trzzbk > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:13 ] Sokratesz > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:16 ] Song Li > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:21 ] TeaDaze > Passed 9 for
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:27 ] ElvenLord > ================
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:31 ] ElvenLord > next: 3. Sources of Mineral Investigation
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:38 ] TeaDaze > http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Sources_of_Mineral_Investigation_%28CSM%29
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:42 ] Song Li > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:46:56 ] ElvenLord > I have something to say here first before we go in discussion
[ 2010.04.11 17:47:14 ] ElvenLord > we where shown the sheet and nice graphs made by John on the summit
[ 2010.04.11 17:47:36 ] ElvenLord > and they confirmed that mineral composition did not change from last time they made it public
[ 2010.04.11 17:47:45 ] ElvenLord > as such I dont find this an issue
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:09 ] ElvenLord > but would move to a motion for CSM to ask/demand CCP to publish a new blog about it
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:23 ] ElvenLord > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:27 ] Z0D > (inform the players)
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:30 ] TeaDaze > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:32 ] ElvenLord > yup
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:35 ] ElvenLord > Song Li go
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:48 ] Song Li > Nevermind.. just follow yours instead :-P
[ 2010.04.11 17:48:59 ] ElvenLord > TeaDaze go
[ 2010.04.11 17:49:00 ] TeaDaze > CCP just need to publish the pretty blue graphs from CCP Diagoras and the issue is sorted [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:49:19 ] Alekseyev Karrde > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:49:30 ] ElvenLord > Alekseyev Karrde go
[ 2010.04.11 17:49:36 ] Song Li > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:49:50 ] Alekseyev Karrde > I insist this proposal contain an audio brief by Song while he's drunk [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:00 ] Z0D > :)
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:04 ] ElvenLord > rofl
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:07 ] ElvenLord > Song Li go
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:25 ] Song Li > I say we insist on only bue in the graph... and Hey!
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:41 ] ElvenLord > OK, pls vote for the motion of a new dev blog and I will send them a mail with our request. Y or N
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:43 ] ElvenLord > ==============
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:44 ] ElvenLord > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:45 ] Song Li > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:47 ] Sokratesz > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:50 ] Z0D > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:54 ] Zastrow > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:56 ] Alekseyev Karrde > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:57 ] TeaDaze > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:50:58 ] Korvin > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:51:26 ] ElvenLord > Asher?
[ 2010.04.11 17:51:47 ] Z0D > /emote passes Asher a another beer....
[ 2010.04.11 17:52:14 ] Mrs Trzzbk > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:52:14 ] T'Amber > <cough> y
[ 2010.04.11 17:52:15 ] Mrs Trzzbk > sorry
[ 2010.04.11 17:52:24 ] TeaDaze > Passed 9 for
[ 2010.04.11 17:52:31 ] ElvenLord > ================
[ 2010.04.11 17:52:43 ] ElvenLord > NEXT: 4. Contract Login Update Notification
[ 2010.04.11 17:52:45 ] TeaDaze > http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contract_Login_Update_Notification_%28CSM%29
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:07 ] Mrs Trzzbk > We shouldn't need to even discuss this
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:15 ] Alekseyev Karrde > agreed
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:15 ] ElvenLord > true
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:16 ] Sokratesz > c
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:19 ] Z0D > that one is really just straightforward
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:23 ] Alekseyev Karrde > vizzote
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:26 ] ElvenLord > lets vote, Y or N
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:27 ] ElvenLord > ================
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:28 ] ElvenLord > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:29 ] Z0D > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:30 ] TeaDaze > Y
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:32 ] Song Li > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:37 ] Sokratesz > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:53:52 ] Alekseyev Karrde > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:00 ] Zastrow > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:02 ] Korvin > y (actually it fleshes for me right now, when i log in)
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:17 ] ElvenLord > not for me :(
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:21 ] Z0D > as well
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:27 ] Mrs Trzzbk > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:32 ] TeaDaze > Passed 9 for
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:37 ] ElvenLord > =======================
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:46 ] ElvenLord > OK now listen carefully
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:51 ] ElvenLord > NEXT: 5. View ship fittings in hanger without boarding ship
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:54 ] TeaDaze > http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/View_ship_fittings_in_hanger_without_boarding_ship_%28CSM%29
[ 2010.04.11 17:54:59 ] Mrs Trzzbk > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:07 ] Song Li > y
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:08 ] ElvenLord > this has been already raised by CSM3
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:11 ] T'Amber > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:14 ] ElvenLord > and declined by CCP
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:31 ] ElvenLord > but, there might be a way of getting it trough diferent means
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:38 ] ElvenLord > and that is the fitting tool
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:46 ] Korvin > name your ships with a bit of sence to solve this issue :P
[ 2010.04.11 17:55:58 ] TeaDaze > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:05 ] ElvenLord > by simply adding 2 buttins so you can scroll trough ships in hangar
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:17 ] ElvenLord > this might work and not get declined by CCP
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:23 ] Zastrow > buttin
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:30 ] ElvenLord > buttons
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:34 ] Zastrow > ur a buttin
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:45 ] Song Li > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:47 ] Korvin > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:47 ] Mrs Trzzbk > butte on (your head)
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:51 ] ElvenLord > TD and me could amend proposal with pretty pictures for it
[ 2010.04.11 17:56:54 ] ElvenLord > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:02 ] ElvenLord > T'Amber go
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:05 ] T'Amber > Is there any reason not to do this? Server queries or something? [/end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:22 ] Z0D > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:26 ] T'Amber > anyone know why it was denied last time?
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:33 ] ElvenLord > didnt get the explanation on this ecept the proposal is not possible to do
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:40 ] ElvenLord > TeaDaze go
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:41 ] TeaDaze > @Korvin, Naming ships doesn't always work because frequently the names reset on session change :P
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:44 ] T'Amber > kk thnx
[ 2010.04.11 17:57:51 ] Alekseyev Karrde > !
[ 2010.04.11 17:58:05 ] ElvenLord > Song Li go
[ 2010.04.11 17:58:05 ] TeaDaze > Secondly, when this proposal was raised last time the only way to view fittings was the fitting window
[ 2010.04.11 17:58:07 ] Song Li > Well right now you can show cargo container contents remotely and that goes for ships' fittings. You also get that info from the API and 3rd party apps so I don't see why it couldn't be implimented easily through the fitting window.
[ 2010.04.11 17:58:09 ] Song Li > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:58:10 ] TeaDaze > (not finished)
[ 2010.04.11 17:58:41 ] TeaDaze > Now there is the saved fitting display, which doesn't require the pilot to be in the ship (or indeed a ship)
[ 2010.04.11 17:59:01 ] TeaDaze > So using that might well be an option as suggested [end]
[ 2010.04.11 17:59:14 ] ElvenLord > Korvin go
[ 2010.04.11 17:59:30 ] Korvin > there is a tab to see your ship modules on your current ship in info
[ 2010.04.11 17:59:52 ] Korvin > i think they could do something like that for every ship you own
[ 2010.04.11 18:00:16 ] Korvin > but there might be some security reason not to do it
[ 2010.04.11 18:00:50 ] Korvin > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 18:00:57 ] ElvenLord > Z0D go
[ 2010.04.11 18:00:59 ] Z0D > using the Eve Assets app that pulls information through API, it generates a list which includes which ship slots etc items are located, would defitively be possible, but CCP is not willing to put the time for it.
[ 2010.04.11 18:01:35 ] Z0D > there is also the ship fitting saved settings, but we need that limit raised drastically to be used there [end]
[ 2010.04.11 18:01:45 ] ElvenLord > Alekseyev Karrde go
[ 2010.04.11 18:01:47 ] Alekseyev Karrde > I really REALLY think CCP should reconsider adding something like this.  Even if it's not the full blown fitting screen but just a simple text list [end]
[ 2010.04.11 18:02:06 ] TeaDaze > !
[ 2010.04.11 18:03:02 ] Mrs Trzzbk > is this the last item?
[ 2010.04.11 18:03:30 ] Mrs Trzzbk > well my vote is y and i have to go so i hope it is
[ 2010.04.11 18:04:07 ] Z0D > !
[ 2010.04.11 18:04:19 ] ElvenLord > TeaDaze go
[ 2010.04.11 18:04:20 ] TeaDaze > I don't think the full fitting window is an option because it would need the player skills etc. and would confuse people if it was read only. Using the saved fitting window though (maybe with the ticks and crosses) shouldn't be a major job to implement.
[ 2010.04.11 18:04:25 ] TeaDaze > [end]
[ 2010.04.11 18:07:11 ] ElvenLord > so what are we voting on then?
[ 2010.04.11 18:07:26 ] ElvenLord > since the proposal as it is is the declined one
[ 2010.04.11 18:07:37 ] Z0D > !
[ 2010.04.11 18:07:40 ] ElvenLord > do you want to amend it and we can vote on it next meeting?
[ 2010.04.11 18:07:55 ] TeaDaze > Can do if a quick edit isn't good enough
[ 2010.04.11 18:08:15 ] ElvenLord > it can not be the same as old proposal
[ 2010.04.11 18:08:17 ] TeaDaze > "Right click on ship in hanger should have the option to view fitting as per the saved fitting window"
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:04 ] ElvenLord > ok then lets vote on new solution for old problem "Right click on ship in hanger should have the option to view fitting as per the saved fitting window" (wiki needed to be updated)
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:07 ] ElvenLord > Y or N
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:09 ] ElvenLord > ========================
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:11 ] ElvenLord > Y
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:12 ] TeaDaze > Y
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:12 ] Song Li > y
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:24 ] Sokratesz > y
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:33 ] T'Amber > Mrs Trzzbk -> y
[ 2010.04.11 18:09:52 ] Z0D > !
[ 2010.04.11 18:10:07 ] Korvin > y
[ 2010.04.11 18:10:16 ] ElvenLord > Z0D go
[ 2010.04.11 18:10:44 ] Z0D > as well i believe this should be inside personal hangar for security reasons with the right click added edit on the proposal as TD mentioned. [end]
[ 2010.04.11 18:10:50 ] Z0D > Y on ammended as well
[ 2010.04.11 18:11:31 ] ElvenLord > thats 7 for, zastrow is missing and greg
[ 2010.04.11 18:12:17 ] T'Amber > Y
[ 2010.04.11 18:13:32 ] TeaDaze > Call them AFK and pass with 8?
[ 2010.04.11 18:13:41 ] ElvenLord > done
[ 2010.04.11 18:13:47 ] ElvenLord > passed 8 for
[ 2010.04.11 18:13:47 ] TeaDaze > Passed 8 for
[ 2010.04.11 18:13:48 ] Z0D > it wins anyway
[ 2010.04.11 18:13:56 ] ElvenLord > ===============
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:00 ] T'Amber > yeah, im irrelevant X)
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:03 ] T'Amber > thanks zod
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:05 ] ElvenLord > next meeting, how about in 3 weeks
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:15 ] Sokratesz > sure
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:16 ] ElvenLord > may 3rd
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:21 ] ElvenLord > 2nd
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:22 ] Z0D > why 3 weeks?
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:34 ] ElvenLord > more time to get stuff for agenda
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:36 ] ElvenLord > :D
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:42 ] Song Li > checking
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:45 ] T'Amber > lols
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:46 ] Alekseyev Karrde > i'm a Y bty
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:48 ] Alekseyev Karrde > *btw
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:50 ] Alekseyev Karrde > sry
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:53 ] Sokratesz > :D
[ 2010.04.11 18:14:55 ] Alekseyev Karrde > had to step away from pc
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:01 ] TeaDaze > Could do with a few other delegates raising issues *hint hint* :P
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:05 ] T'Amber > i have some items if someone wants to put them up on the agenda.
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:08 ] Sokratesz > * i step away from the pc to breathe in*
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:13 ] ElvenLord > T'Amber
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:15 ] T'Amber > 6 or so issues.
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:16 ] Song Li > kk I'm good may 2nd
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:17 ] T'Amber > :}
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:19 ] Z0D > and keep the 2 weeks delay
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:19 ] ElvenLord > I would be glad to do it
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:31 ] ElvenLord > send them to my mail
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:32 ] T'Amber > awesome.
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:34 ] Korvin > may 2nd is my char birthday lol
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:41 ] Korvin > bring pies )
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:41 ] ElvenLord > cool
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:44 ] Alekseyev Karrde > :))
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:45 ] T'Amber > ill have to find them
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:56 ] ElvenLord > NEXT MEETING IS ON SATURDAY MAY 2nd @ 17:00
[ 2010.04.11 18:15:57 ] Alekseyev Karrde > i grad may 1 but may 2 will work i think
[ 2010.04.11 18:16:02 ] ElvenLord > MEETING IS OVER
[ 2010.04.11 18:16:03 ] T'Amber > theyre probably on page 20 of the forums by now
[ 2010.04.11 18:16:06 ] ElvenLord > ==================