Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aligning"
m (Protected "Talk:Aligning" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
(→Incorrect) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I think this is false. Ships with 'jump cloak' will not join the fleet warp. | I think this is false. Ships with 'jump cloak' will not join the fleet warp. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tested this today and I am wrong. Fleet will warp even if still cloaked (from jump) as long as you are on grid. Not if use cloaking device or off grid. | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 27 October 2010
Naming convention
- Shouldn't this be rather Aligning according to wiki naming conventions?
--SentryRaven 23:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)- Moved as per the wiki naming conventions. --ISD Shiva 12:01, 18 May 2009 (GMT)
- Funnily enough, the page didn't disappear from the Category page, although the nc-Tag was removed.
--SentryRaven 23:13, 7 June 2009 (GMT)
- Funnily enough, the page didn't disappear from the Category page, although the nc-Tag was removed.
- Moved as per the wiki naming conventions. --ISD Shiva 12:01, 18 May 2009 (GMT)
Good work
This article has really taken shape since I last visited it. Covers the subject well. Rated 5/5. --Nareg Maxence 12:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Mass units
Apparently different clients display mass differently. A UK player I talked to displayed the mass of a retriever as 20,000 tons while a US client shows a retriever at 20,000,000 kg. This should either be documented in the page, or fixed as a inconsistency between clients. --Alec Grahm 22:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Incorrect
"This does not apply to ships under the complimentary cloaking provided upon gate exit, however. Ships under such cloaking will immediately respond to the fleet warp command."
I think this is false. Ships with 'jump cloak' will not join the fleet warp.
Tested this today and I am wrong. Fleet will warp even if still cloaked (from jump) as long as you are on grid. Not if use cloaking device or off grid.