Difference between revisions of "Suicide Ganking Part 3 (CSM)"

From Backstage Lore Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Suicide Ganking Part 3 moved to Suicide Ganking Part 3 (CSM): Naming conventions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Stats ==
 
== Stats ==
 
* '''Title''': Suicide Ganking Part 3
 
* '''Title''': Suicide Ganking Part 3
* '''Raised by''': [[Z0D]]
+
* '''Raised by''': [[Contributor name:Z0D|Z0D]]
 
* '''Submission Date''': 3 Dec 2009
 
* '''Submission Date''': 3 Dec 2009
 
* '''Issue ID''': ???
 
* '''Issue ID''': ???
Line 20: Line 20:
 
== Relevant Forum Threads ==
 
== Relevant Forum Threads ==
 
* http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1222490
 
* http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1222490
 +
 +
==CSM Meeting Minutes==
 +
 +
* [[CSM Meeting Minutes 4.003]]
  
 
== Relevant Info ==
 
== Relevant Info ==

Revision as of 12:32, 1 July 2010

Stats

  • Title: Suicide Ganking Part 3
  • Raised by: Z0D
  • Submission Date: 3 Dec 2009
  • Issue ID: ???

Summary

This issue has been raised in the past. CCP has increased CONCORD response times and increased the security standing hits, but to me these are more band-aid fixes than actual solutions.

One of the issues brought up repeatedly on the forums is the problem with suicide gankers being paid insurance for their ships upon CONCORD destruction, which makes suicide ganking cheap if not free, and that players can board ships in space and thus continue ganking even if they are at -10 security status. Another complaint is people using (recycled) alts in destroyers wreaking havoc, due to the ease to train for destroyers, low price, and large damage output. Doing away with insurance and making the consequences for low sec status more severe won't fix this, for instance.

Instead of proposing solutions, which has already been done in the past, I'd like to have an open discussion with CCP and my fellow CSM about the current situation of suicide ganking and if any mechanics need changing. I will also gather community

feedback and relay this to CCP.

Potential Solutions

  • Open for discussion with the CSM and CCP.

Relevant Forum Threads

CSM Meeting Minutes

Relevant Info

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools