Difference between revisions of "Spreading Out Missionrunners (CSM)"

From Backstage Lore Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == Stats == <ul><li> <b>Raised by</b>: Ankhesentapemkah </li><li> <b>Submission Date</b>: 6 June 2010 </li><li> <b>Issue ID</b>: tbd </li></ul> == Summary == O...)
 
(No difference)

Revision as of 20:42, 12 June 2010

Stats

Summary

One of the frequently stated intentions is to spread out players in high security space, and prevent large clusters of mission-runners to occupy a system.

Unfortunately, CCP's approach has been to add more agents for overused corps/factions. This gives these corporations an advantage over others, causing more players to flock to systems with agents beloning to these factions.

Recently, CCP has changed the automated load-balancing system, but this only makes more agents useless as agents have a very strong preference to send players to low-sec systems now. This again has an opposite effect, it drives players back to existing mission hubs in deep high-sec.

In my opinion, the correct approach to this problem is to make other corporations more attractive for mission running and balancing the agent distribution between the factions.

Potential Solutions

  • Bringing agent quantity and type inline between the big four: Caldari currently has an absurd advantage over the other factions due to the overabundance of good combat agents.
  • Adding agents for factions which are not the big four: Sisters of Eve, Khanid Kingdom, Ammatar Mandate, Interbus.
  • Changing the standing matrix to make factions such as Thukker Tribe and Intaki Syndicate more attractive.
  • Adding more (LP shop) incentives to run missions for lowsec/0.0 factions such as ORE, Mordus Legion, Intaki Syndicate.
  • Rebalancing mission hubs, players should have to choose between either a single high-quality agent or multiple low-quality agents, not both.

Pros

  • Reduces server load (Hurray!)
  • Gives players more options
  • Most solutions are extremely easy to implement
  • Encourages players to move around more instead of staying in one place

Cons

  • Can't think of any

Relevant Forum Threads

  • [1] - Issue thread
  • [2] - Load Balancing Issue Thread


Votes

tba

Passes: ?

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools