Difference between revisions of "Talk:Band of Brothers (Player alliance)"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
m (Protected "Talk:Band of Brothers (Player alliance)" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
(comment) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Military Campaigns== | ||
I think that events like the MAX Campaign should be moved to their own articles, where they can remain fairly impartial. Particularly where the events are subjective and opinions come from multiple sources. --[[Contributor name:FireFoxx80|FireFoxx80]] 18:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | I think that events like the MAX Campaign should be moved to their own articles, where they can remain fairly impartial. Particularly where the events are subjective and opinions come from multiple sources. --[[Contributor name:FireFoxx80|FireFoxx80]] 18:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
I do think that alliance conflicts should be noted in their pages, but I agree with the partiality portion. [[Contributor name:Cal Hydar|Cal Hydar]] 19:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | I do think that alliance conflicts should be noted in their pages, but I agree with the partiality portion. [[Contributor name:Cal Hydar|Cal Hydar]] 19:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I agree that a summary of the alliance conflict should be given, and then covered in greater detail in specific campaign pages. At present, the campaign history is incomplete and confused. [[Contributor name:Sandy Brown|Sandy Brown]] 07:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Correcting Links== | ||
Please do correct links, I added the correct links for [[Triumvirate. (Player alliance)]] and [[GOODFELLAS (Player alliance)]] --[[Contributor name:KayTwoEx|KayTwoEx]] 22:24, 13 December 2008 (CET/UTC+1) | Please do correct links, I added the correct links for [[Triumvirate. (Player alliance)]] and [[GOODFELLAS (Player alliance)]] --[[Contributor name:KayTwoEx|KayTwoEx]] 22:24, 13 December 2008 (CET/UTC+1) | ||
Revision as of 01:19, 24 December 2008
Military Campaigns
I think that events like the MAX Campaign should be moved to their own articles, where they can remain fairly impartial. Particularly where the events are subjective and opinions come from multiple sources. --FireFoxx80 18:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
I do think that alliance conflicts should be noted in their pages, but I agree with the partiality portion. Cal Hydar 19:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that a summary of the alliance conflict should be given, and then covered in greater detail in specific campaign pages. At present, the campaign history is incomplete and confused. Sandy Brown 07:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Correcting Links
Please do correct links, I added the correct links for Triumvirate. (Player alliance) and GOODFELLAS (Player alliance) --KayTwoEx 22:24, 13 December 2008 (CET/UTC+1)