Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amarr-Jove War"

From Backstage Lore Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "Talk:Amarr-Jove War" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
::AFAIK, the chronicle is the only written info CCP has put out  about it - do let me know if there's something I missed.  IMO if there's an encylopedic Chronicle on a subject allready, there's no point in writing things twice.  In a case where there is other background info avalible as well as a chronicle, the result would be something like [[Gallente-Caldari War]].  [[Contributor name:Faraelle Brightman|Faraelle Brightman]] 04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 
::AFAIK, the chronicle is the only written info CCP has put out  about it - do let me know if there's something I missed.  IMO if there's an encylopedic Chronicle on a subject allready, there's no point in writing things twice.  In a case where there is other background info avalible as well as a chronicle, the result would be something like [[Gallente-Caldari War]].  [[Contributor name:Faraelle Brightman|Faraelle Brightman]] 04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
::There is some additional info in Theodacy, I believe.  Not much, but. . . .  And just because there isn't backstory available now doesn't mean we shouldn't write things with the anticipation of there eventually being more backstory.  Still, you do have a point in that there isn't much other info available, so at this point the page would be rather sparse. --[[Contributor name:Garion Avarr|Garion Avarr]] 04:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:36, 12 December 2008

Should this really be a redirect? Vak-Atioth may have been the only military conflict in the war, but there's more that could be said about the war than a single battle -- the background of it, for example. --Garion Avarr 01:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

AFAIK, the chronicle is the only written info CCP has put out about it - do let me know if there's something I missed. IMO if there's an encylopedic Chronicle on a subject allready, there's no point in writing things twice. In a case where there is other background info avalible as well as a chronicle, the result would be something like Gallente-Caldari War. Faraelle Brightman 04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
There is some additional info in Theodacy, I believe. Not much, but. . . . And just because there isn't backstory available now doesn't mean we shouldn't write things with the anticipation of there eventually being more backstory. Still, you do have a point in that there isn't much other info available, so at this point the page would be rather sparse. --Garion Avarr 04:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools