Difference between revisions of "Talk:Naglfar"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
(Naglfar Inferiority?) |
(→Naglfar Inferiority?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There was an assertion on the main page regarding perceptions of inferiority of the Naglfar. I'd like to see a more complete discussion than a one sentence unsubstantiated claim. --[[Contributor name:Mariokoli Mianana|Mariokoli Mianana]] 19:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | There was an assertion on the main page regarding perceptions of inferiority of the Naglfar. I'd like to see a more complete discussion than a one sentence unsubstantiated claim. --[[Contributor name:Mariokoli Mianana|Mariokoli Mianana]] 19:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's considered inferior because you have to train for two different capital weapon system and thus takes longer to train for. It also has poor PG/CPU and a split weapons layout. There's a big discussion on the CSM area of the Eve-O forums on it.--[[Contributor name:Namaraa|Namaraa]] 19:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 12 December 2008
Naglfar Inferiority?
There was an assertion on the main page regarding perceptions of inferiority of the Naglfar. I'd like to see a more complete discussion than a one sentence unsubstantiated claim. --Mariokoli Mianana 19:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
It's considered inferior because you have to train for two different capital weapon system and thus takes longer to train for. It also has poor PG/CPU and a split weapons layout. There's a big discussion on the CSM area of the Eve-O forums on it.--Namaraa 19:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)