Difference between revisions of "Forum Censorship (CSM)"
m (Forum Censorship moved to Forum Censorship (CSM): Naming conventions) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Stats == | == Stats == | ||
| − | * '''Raised by''': Alekseyev Karrde | + | * '''Raised by''': [[Contributor name:Alekseyev Karrde|Alekseyev Karrde]] |
* '''Submission Date''': 20 December 2009 | * '''Submission Date''': 20 December 2009 | ||
* '''Issue ID''': tbd | * '''Issue ID''': tbd | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* Dominion Capital Ships dev blog | * Dominion Capital Ships dev blog | ||
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1217073 | http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1217073 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==CSM Meeting Minutes== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[CSM Meeting Minutes 4.003]] | ||
Revision as of 11:27, 1 July 2010
Stats
- Raised by: Alekseyev Karrde
- Submission Date: 20 December 2009
- Issue ID: tbd
Summary
The EVE forums have recently undergone two changes, one technical and one policy, which have increased the frustration of the player base.
The first issue was the implementation of a 5 minute cool down timer posts designed to combat external link spammers. While it fixed the problem it was designed to fix, it has chilled normal player activity on the forums.
The second issue was a much more aggressive approach taken by the forum moderators resulting in high numbers of deleted posts. Particularly noticable in the context of some of the Dominion dev blogs, accusations were made that moderators were censoring dissent.
Solution
- Shorten the cool down timer between posts
- Increase transparency and accountability regarding forum moderation
Pros
- Increased usability of the forums
- Happier players
- More trust between player base and CCP
Cons
- Will impose more demands on the moderators
Relevant Forum Threads
- Assembly Hall
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1217610
- Dominion Capital Ships dev blog
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1217073