Difference between revisions of "Assault Frigates 4th Bonus (CSM)"

From Backstage Lore Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "Assault Frigates 4th Bonus" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
(added vote)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
[[Category:CSM_Third_Candidacy]]
 
[[Category:CSM_Third_Candidacy]]
 
[[Category:Issues_in_Process]]
 
[[Category:Issues_in_Process]]
 +
 +
== Votes ==
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Dierdra Vaal|Dierdra Vaal]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Vuk Lau|Vuk Lau]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Mazzilliu|mazzilliu]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Zastrow J|Zastrow J]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Erik Finnegan|Erik Finnegan]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Avalloc|Avalloc]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Omber Zombie|Omber Zombie]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Larkonis Trassler|Larkonis Trassler]] - yes
 +
* [[Contributor_name:Meissa Anunthiel|Meissa Anunthiel]] - yes

Revision as of 04:45, 16 August 2009

Stats

Summary

At the moment, Interceptors are in almost all cases preferable to an Assault Frigate, and in some cases the T1 counterpart of the Assault Frigate deals more damage than their T2 variant.


Solution

Evaluate the Assault Frigates and apply a 4th bonus (currently, they have three).

  • Pros
    • Assault Frigates will be a more viable choice
    • Newer players can fly the Assault Frigate in PVE/PVE while training for a HAC, improved progression through ship classes this way
    • More options for small gang warfare
  • Cons
    • Requires effort from the balancing team and may be difficult to achieve a distinct difference between the AF and the Interceptor and keeping both valid choices

Relevant Forum Threads

Votes

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools