Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fiction Articles"
m (Protected "Talk:Fiction Articles" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I don't think the template should add a category. | I don't think the template should add a category. | ||
--[[Contributor name:Dex Nederland|Dex Nederland]] 14:51, 12 June 2009 (GMT) | --[[Contributor name:Dex Nederland|Dex Nederland]] 14:51, 12 June 2009 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then how does a player know this portion of a page is offiical fiction and this portion of a page is just player conjecture. I think the two need to be clearly seperated or we muddy the waters alot? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[Contributor name:CCP Ginger|CCP Ginger]] 15:04, 12 June 2009 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 09:04, 12 June 2009
Page Formating
Please add the following around {{Fiction}}
<nowiki>{{Fiction}}
</nowiki>
--Dex Nederland 14:45, 12 June 2009 (GMT)
Fan Fiction/Opinion
This very much depends on the policy of CCP/ISD in regards to "mixed" pages. At the moment some pages can contain both CCP content (NPC corporate entries) and player generated content. A basic template saying, "The following information is conjecture, opinion, or player-produced." may work. I think we should shy away from the term "Fan Fiction", the Caldari langauge fx is not Fan Fiction per se, but rather player-produced content.
I don't think the template should add a category. --Dex Nederland 14:51, 12 June 2009 (GMT)
Then how does a player know this portion of a page is offiical fiction and this portion of a page is just player conjecture. I think the two need to be clearly seperated or we muddy the waters alot?
--CCP Ginger 15:04, 12 June 2009 (GMT)