Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"
(New page: "7089 A.D. - Gallente -The second planet in the VH-451 system is bought by people from Tau-ceti system of French origin." I made my own consolidated version of the timeline about a year a...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I made my own consolidated version of the timeline about a year ago, and I noticed this entry. The system in question is Luminaire (a later entry states that another planet in the system was purchased by a Mega-corporation, presumably being the origin of the Caldari). This date is 900 years before the discovery of the EVE gate, and I sincerely doubt that these Frenchmen were able to purchase a system that would not be discovered for the better part of a millennium. I presume that someone at CCP slipped on the "0" rather than the "9", and in my timeline it is corrected thus. I would suggest that the same is done here. --[[Contributor name:Alexeph Stoekai|Alexeph Stoekai]] 21:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | I made my own consolidated version of the timeline about a year ago, and I noticed this entry. The system in question is Luminaire (a later entry states that another planet in the system was purchased by a Mega-corporation, presumably being the origin of the Caldari). This date is 900 years before the discovery of the EVE gate, and I sincerely doubt that these Frenchmen were able to purchase a system that would not be discovered for the better part of a millennium. I presume that someone at CCP slipped on the "0" rather than the "9", and in my timeline it is corrected thus. I would suggest that the same is done here. --[[Contributor name:Alexeph Stoekai|Alexeph Stoekai]] 21:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thank you for pointing that out, Edited and waiting aproval | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::--[[Contributor name:Charles Viran|Charles Viran]] 22:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 12 April 2009
"7089 A.D. - Gallente -The second planet in the VH-451 system is bought by people from Tau-ceti system of French origin."
I made my own consolidated version of the timeline about a year ago, and I noticed this entry. The system in question is Luminaire (a later entry states that another planet in the system was purchased by a Mega-corporation, presumably being the origin of the Caldari). This date is 900 years before the discovery of the EVE gate, and I sincerely doubt that these Frenchmen were able to purchase a system that would not be discovered for the better part of a millennium. I presume that someone at CCP slipped on the "0" rather than the "9", and in my timeline it is corrected thus. I would suggest that the same is done here. --Alexeph Stoekai 21:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out, Edited and waiting aproval
- --Charles Viran 22:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)