Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sovereignty (Disambiguation)"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
m (Protected "Talk:Sovereignty (Disambiguation)" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
m (→Merge Sovereignty (Mechanics) to Sovereignty: ARTICLE (blah)'s are bad. really bad.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I'd recommend against this. Because of the way the item database was set up, [[Sovereignty]] should really be [[Sovereignty (Skill)]], but takes the top level slot because it is an item in the ItemDB. Sovereignty, the skill, has nothing to do with Sovereignty, the mechanic. Thus they don't share anything in common that would encourage them to be merged. Since we can't move the skill to a new page due to the technical restriction, the best that can be done is add a disambiguation to the mechanic. It's a poor solution, and a hallmark of something I'd like changed, but it is what it is. --[[Contributor name:Mariokoli Mianana|Mariokoli Mianana]] 16:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | :I'd recommend against this. Because of the way the item database was set up, [[Sovereignty]] should really be [[Sovereignty (Skill)]], but takes the top level slot because it is an item in the ItemDB. Sovereignty, the skill, has nothing to do with Sovereignty, the mechanic. Thus they don't share anything in common that would encourage them to be merged. Since we can't move the skill to a new page due to the technical restriction, the best that can be done is add a disambiguation to the mechanic. It's a poor solution, and a hallmark of something I'd like changed, but it is what it is. --[[Contributor name:Mariokoli Mianana|Mariokoli Mianana]] 16:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The less articles with ()'s there are, the better. | ||
| + | If Sovereignty has nothign to do with Sovereignty (*smirk*) then it should carry some other name. e.g. [[act of sovereignty]] or [[sovereignty over solar system]]. | ||
Revision as of 10:48, 9 January 2009
Merge Sovereignty (Mechanics) to Sovereignty
Instead of adding link from the Sovereignty to Sovereignty (Mechanics) or creating Disambiguation page, rather move the content from Sovereignty (Mechanics) to Sovereignty. Disambiguation would create a situation where there is one empty article, one short one and one decent one vs. the present one empty and one decent.
BlackSmith Sisunautti 16:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'd recommend against this. Because of the way the item database was set up, Sovereignty should really be Sovereignty (Skill), but takes the top level slot because it is an item in the ItemDB. Sovereignty, the skill, has nothing to do with Sovereignty, the mechanic. Thus they don't share anything in common that would encourage them to be merged. Since we can't move the skill to a new page due to the technical restriction, the best that can be done is add a disambiguation to the mechanic. It's a poor solution, and a hallmark of something I'd like changed, but it is what it is. --Mariokoli Mianana 16:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
The less articles with ()'s there are, the better. If Sovereignty has nothign to do with Sovereignty (*smirk*) then it should carry some other name. e.g. act of sovereignty or sovereignty over solar system.