Difference between revisions of "Talk:Level 4 mission ship fits"
m (Protected "Talk:L4 Mission Ship Fits" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
(→Intention good, but not well executed) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
After that more advanced and expensive setups can be added, however the most interesting here would be more or less distinctive variations, for example a Dominix with sentry drones. | After that more advanced and expensive setups can be added, however the most interesting here would be more or less distinctive variations, for example a Dominix with sentry drones. | ||
| − | And the 4 billion isk über-setup is generally not so interesting. | + | And the 4 billion isk über-setup is generally not so interesting. |
| + | |||
| + | :I originally didn't put much effort into formatting because I was working out the fits and just get everything linked and looking good. On top of getting mission specific hardeners going well... which crashed and burned. The final setup was going to look at entry zones. Low skill-low cost vs low skill-high cost vs high skill-medium cost. Krystal came and gave the current formatting. Too which I cant go and destroy, because tbh it isnt that bad. Also if you disagree with 1 or more of the fits. You can discuss it here in talk or simply goto the item database for the ship and post the fit there. Also Remember to Sign your stuff :) --[[Contributor name:Jason Edwards|Jason Edwards]] 04:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Article name == | == Article name == | ||
Level 4 Mission Ship fits | Level 4 Mission Ship fits | ||
better? abbreviations is ok but for new players they are confusing. is there any section with guidelines for such things yet? | better? abbreviations is ok but for new players they are confusing. is there any section with guidelines for such things yet? | ||
Revision as of 22:04, 12 December 2008
Ingame Browser
This page isn't compatible with the IGB. Could someone figure out why that is?--Jason Edwards 04:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Intention good, but not well executed
Me thinks this information can be better organized First, all races on one page is not necessary. Second, the feasibility of some the setups can be questioned as well, but this will work itself out hopefully.
Me thinks a better approach would be to give each race their own page, or even each ship their own page. listing first a fitting that 1. Is possible to fit for pilots with lower SP 2. Corresponds with recommended Certificates 3. should be affordable as well, so no faction and T2.
Also there should be a short comment about the setup and how to use it the best way.
From this beginner setup, 2-3 improvements could be recommended as to give an clue about what is good way to improve on such a setup.
After that more advanced and expensive setups can be added, however the most interesting here would be more or less distinctive variations, for example a Dominix with sentry drones. And the 4 billion isk über-setup is generally not so interesting.
- I originally didn't put much effort into formatting because I was working out the fits and just get everything linked and looking good. On top of getting mission specific hardeners going well... which crashed and burned. The final setup was going to look at entry zones. Low skill-low cost vs low skill-high cost vs high skill-medium cost. Krystal came and gave the current formatting. Too which I cant go and destroy, because tbh it isnt that bad. Also if you disagree with 1 or more of the fits. You can discuss it here in talk or simply goto the item database for the ship and post the fit there. Also Remember to Sign your stuff :) --Jason Edwards 04:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Article name
Level 4 Mission Ship fits better? abbreviations is ok but for new players they are confusing. is there any section with guidelines for such things yet?