Difference between revisions of "Talk:New Eden crew guidelines"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
m (Talk:New Eden Crew Guidelines moved to Talk:New Eden crew guidelines: Naming conventions.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Following that reason it would then be fair to assume that the tech 3 cruiser should require little or no crew at all, considering how sophisticated they are and how automated everything must be. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
It's often been speculated that since Tech 2 ships are designed expressly for capsuleer piloting, they might generally have lower crew requirements. Can a CCP type confirm/deny this? It'd be good info to include here if it is in fact the case. | It's often been speculated that since Tech 2 ships are designed expressly for capsuleer piloting, they might generally have lower crew requirements. Can a CCP type confirm/deny this? It'd be good info to include here if it is in fact the case. | ||
Revision as of 12:15, 26 January 2012
Following that reason it would then be fair to assume that the tech 3 cruiser should require little or no crew at all, considering how sophisticated they are and how automated everything must be.
It's often been speculated that since Tech 2 ships are designed expressly for capsuleer piloting, they might generally have lower crew requirements. Can a CCP type confirm/deny this? It'd be good info to include here if it is in fact the case.
How is the change from most frigates having zero crew explained? I'm mainly interested in why they did before and don't now: that's a step backwards and I don't see why all capsuleers everywhere would suddenly take it. - Mirabi Tiane 07:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)