Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amarr-Jove War"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::AFAIK, the chronicle is the only written info CCP has put out about it - do let me know if there's something I missed. IMO if there's an encylopedic Chronicle on a subject allready, there's no point in writing things twice. In a case where there is other background info avalible as well as a chronicle, the result would be something like [[Gallente-Caldari War]]. [[Contributor name:Faraelle Brightman|Faraelle Brightman]] 04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ::AFAIK, the chronicle is the only written info CCP has put out about it - do let me know if there's something I missed. IMO if there's an encylopedic Chronicle on a subject allready, there's no point in writing things twice. In a case where there is other background info avalible as well as a chronicle, the result would be something like [[Gallente-Caldari War]]. [[Contributor name:Faraelle Brightman|Faraelle Brightman]] 04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::There is some additional info in Theodacy, I believe. Not much, but. . . . And just because there isn't backstory available now doesn't mean we shouldn't write things with the anticipation of there eventually being more backstory. Still, you do have a point in that there isn't much other info available, so at this point the page would be rather sparse. --[[Contributor name:Garion Avarr|Garion Avarr]] 04:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Removed the redirect and added a summary page --[[Contributor name:CCP Ginger|CCP Ginger]] 13:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 9 September 2009
Should this really be a redirect? Vak-Atioth may have been the only military conflict in the war, but there's more that could be said about the war than a single battle -- the background of it, for example. --Garion Avarr 01:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- AFAIK, the chronicle is the only written info CCP has put out about it - do let me know if there's something I missed. IMO if there's an encylopedic Chronicle on a subject allready, there's no point in writing things twice. In a case where there is other background info avalible as well as a chronicle, the result would be something like Gallente-Caldari War. Faraelle Brightman 04:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- There is some additional info in Theodacy, I believe. Not much, but. . . . And just because there isn't backstory available now doesn't mean we shouldn't write things with the anticipation of there eventually being more backstory. Still, you do have a point in that there isn't much other info available, so at this point the page would be rather sparse. --Garion Avarr 04:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Removed the redirect and added a summary page --CCP Ginger 13:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)