Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Wormhole Bands"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
m (replying) |
m |
||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|} | |} | ||
;If you [http://siggy.borkedlabs.com/info/_media/strengthtable.jpg look at siggy], they've noticed a 2.22 band as well. I plan to look for the remaining 1/80 sigs to make sure they are where they're suppose to be. Till I confirm they've changed, I don't plan to move them. If you can remember which ones you're sure you've measured at 1/80 that would help to clear things up a bit. --[[User:Faulx|Faulx]] 1941, 12 November 2012 (GMT) | ;If you [http://siggy.borkedlabs.com/info/_media/strengthtable.jpg look at siggy], they've noticed a 2.22 band as well. I plan to look for the remaining 1/80 sigs to make sure they are where they're suppose to be. Till I confirm they've changed, I don't plan to move them. If you can remember which ones you're sure you've measured at 1/80 that would help to clear things up a bit. --[[User:Faulx|Faulx]] 1941, 12 November 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | ;;unfortunately, my records do not indicate which ones I confirmed myself and which ones where done by members of corporation. I do/did give each found signature a quality index ranging on a scale of 3, to indicate the trustworthiness of the source, since some pilots are known to be more meticulous than others. [[User:Elisa Fir|Elisa Fir]] 22:05, 12 November 2012 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:05, 12 November 2012
I read your comment on the newly discovvered 1/45 band. I'm absolutely sure I've found and correctly measured several wormholes in the 1/80 band. the difference in signal strength reading is huge, so unless CCP changed their base signature strength, your comment cannot hold truth for all wormholes in the 1/80 band. Elisa Fir 16:57, 12 November 2012 (GMT)
- I have personally confirmed R943 (in null), R474, and A982 to be 1/45 as of 6/21/2012, 7/26/2012, and 10/26/2012 respectively. Data follows:
| (this is the first time I noticed it; I then went back and looked at some older scans, realizing I'd mistaken them as 1/40s) | ||||||
| 10/26/2012 | ||||||
| J145615 | c3 | (DSP probe str 11.9) | ||||
| sigID | 256AU | 64AU | 2AU | (probe directly on signature) | ||
| YKD-448 | .05% | .21% | 6.76% | wormhole A982 | 1/45 | <-- anomaly, what the ? |
| XKD-001 | .11% | .47% | 15.13% | wormhole D845 *HS* | 1/20 | |
| SKD-766 | .22% | .85% | 29.87% | Barren Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 | |
| TKD-213 | .23% | .93% | 29.99% | Ordinary Perimeter Deposit (grav) | 1/10 | |
| WKD-554 | .23% | .93% | 29.85% | Barren Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 | |
| 6/21/2012 | ||||
| 4VY-Y1 | -0.4 | (Geminate) | (4x core probes) | |
| VEJ-407 | 1.04% | wormhole R943 *C2* | 1/45 | <-- anomaly, not 1/40 |
| UEJ-960 | 1.17% | Guristas Provincial HQ (unk) | 1/40 | |
| WFD-996 | 2.24% | Central Guristas Survey Site (radar) | 1/20 | |
| YEJ-748 | 2.31% | Ruined Guristas Temple Site (mag) | 1/20 | |
| WEJ-854 | 4.32% | wormhole N432 *C5* | 1/10 | |
| XEJ-301 | 4.31% | wormhole N432 *C5* | 1/10 |
| 7/26/2012 | ||||
| J115327 | c2 | (4x core probes) | ||
| FKD-925 | 1.04% | wormhole R474 *C6* | 1/45 | <-- anomaly, should be 1/80 |
| FJD-043 | 1.18% | Unsecured Perimeter Comms Relay (radar) | 1/40 | |
| CJD-672 | 1.18% | Unsecured Perimeter Comms Relay (radar) | 1/40 | |
| GKD-382 | 1.18% | Forgotten Perimeter Gateway (mag) | 1/40 | |
| EJD-586 | 1.18% | Forgotten Perimeter Gateway (mag) | 1/40 | |
| DBM-975 | 1.19% | Unsecured Perimeter Transponder Farm (radar) | 1/40 | |
| IKD-296 | 1.20% | Forgotten Perimeter Habitation Coils (mag) | 1/40 | |
| DJD-129 | 1.20% | Unsecured Perimeter Comms Relay (radar) | 1/40 | |
| NKD-581 | 1.20% | Forgotten Perimeter Gateway (mag) | 1/40 | |
| DKD-011 | 1.21% | Unsecured Perimeter Comms Relay (radar) | 1/40 | |
| HKD-839 | 1.21% | wormhole E545 *NS* | 1/40 | |
| XJD-269 | 2.40% | Average Frontier Deposit (grav) | 1/20 | |
| QJD-070 | 2.42% | Average Frontier Deposit (grav) | 1/20 | |
| JJD-871 | 2.43% | Average Frontier Deposit (grav) | 1/20 | |
| GJD-500 | 4.81% | Ordinary Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 | |
| NJD-699 | 4.82% | Ordinary Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 | |
| BKD-097 | 4.82% | Common Perimeter Deposit (grav) | 1/10 | |
| TJD-441 | 4.83% | Token Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 | |
| RJD-527 | 4.83% | Barren Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 | |
| CKD-554 | 4.83% | Ordinary Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 | |
| SJD-984 | 4.85% | Token Perimeter Reservoir (ladar) | 1/10 |
- If you look at siggy, they've noticed a 2.22 band as well. I plan to look for the remaining 1/80 sigs to make sure they are where they're suppose to be. Till I confirm they've changed, I don't plan to move them. If you can remember which ones you're sure you've measured at 1/80 that would help to clear things up a bit. --Faulx 1941, 12 November 2012 (GMT)
- unfortunately, my records do not indicate which ones I confirmed myself and which ones where done by members of corporation. I do/did give each found signature a quality index ranging on a scale of 3, to indicate the trustworthiness of the source, since some pilots are known to be more meticulous than others. Elisa Fir 22
- 05, 12 November 2012 (GMT)