Difference between revisions of "Talk:Item Database:Ammunition & Charges"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
(formatting update) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
When using eg. small 150mm rails, which have a optimal range of 12km, using antimatter charges would bring this down to 6km (Range Bonus -50%). Using lead charges would keep it at 12km (No Range Bonus). Generally the more damage the ammo does, the shorter the range. | When using eg. small 150mm rails, which have a optimal range of 12km, using antimatter charges would bring this down to 6km (Range Bonus -50%). Using lead charges would keep it at 12km (No Range Bonus). Generally the more damage the ammo does, the shorter the range. | ||
| + | ==Formating== | ||
Formatting is broken. Was one big paragraph untill I split it up. Not sure what the best looking formating option is. [[user:salpun]] | Formatting is broken. Was one big paragraph untill I split it up. Not sure what the best looking formating option is. [[user:salpun]] | ||
18:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC) | 18:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bullet points? It is the kind of information you can easily split up like that. --[[User:Milo Caman|Milo Caman]] 19:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 4 January 2012
Range Bonus
Range bonus is a percentage value specifying the bonus (negative or positive) that the ammo will incur when loaded into your guns.
When using eg. small 150mm rails, which have a optimal range of 12km, using antimatter charges would bring this down to 6km (Range Bonus -50%). Using lead charges would keep it at 12km (No Range Bonus). Generally the more damage the ammo does, the shorter the range.
Formating
Formatting is broken. Was one big paragraph untill I split it up. Not sure what the best looking formating option is. user:salpun 18:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Bullet points? It is the kind of information you can easily split up like that. --Milo Caman 19:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)