Difference between revisions of "Talk:Damage types"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The article suffers from excessive and redundant linking of terms, making it hard to read. There is no reason to link _every_ _single_ _time_ that the word 'damage' is used. --[[Contributor name:Rakshasa Taisab|Rakshasa Taisab]] 15:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | The article suffers from excessive and redundant linking of terms, making it hard to read. There is no reason to link _every_ _single_ _time_ that the word 'damage' is used. --[[Contributor name:Rakshasa Taisab|Rakshasa Taisab]] 15:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
You can use the nowiki formating for it <nowiki>Damage</nowiki> if it helps sort it. | You can use the nowiki formating for it <nowiki>Damage</nowiki> if it helps sort it. | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 21 January 2009
Heh. "Too informal?" Because Eve Online is SERIOUS BUSINESS, and certainly not a "game" people play for fun.
The article suffers from excessive and redundant linking of terms, making it hard to read. There is no reason to link _every_ _single_ _time_ that the word 'damage' is used. --Rakshasa Taisab 15:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
You can use the nowiki formating for it Damage if it helps sort it. Not the best solution but if does help sort tings out for now. We are aware that the autolinking motor is nead of some tuning. Somone gave it to mutch sugar so it is a bit overentusiastic, i beleve they are looking into it. --ISD Vakiri Vak'amon 16:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)