Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Incomplete"

From Backstage Lore Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "Template talk:Incomplete" [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Reason For Adding==
 
==Reason For Adding==
 
   An Incomplete is more standard, just thought I'd add it for you guys, stubs are generally saved for empty or one or two sentence articles. [[Contributor name:kalanosh|kalanosh]] 09:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 
   An Incomplete is more standard, just thought I'd add it for you guys, stubs are generally saved for empty or one or two sentence articles. [[Contributor name:kalanosh|kalanosh]] 09:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
Wiki community definition of a stub :
 +
 +
{{quote|A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they lack wikification or copy editing. With these articles, a cleanup template is usually added instead of a stub template. Note that if a small article has little properly sourced information, or if its subject has no inherent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article.}}
 +
 +
Wiki community considers stubs separate from clean-up articles....maybe we should but Incomplete under clean-up? or not, Wiki now classifies incompletes under clean-up category...comments on solutions?[[Contributor name:kalanosh|kalanosh]] 09:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:24, 22 December 2008

Reason For Adding

 An Incomplete is more standard, just thought I'd add it for you guys, stubs are generally saved for empty or one or two sentence articles. kalanosh 09:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Wiki community definition of a stub :



"A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they lack wikification or copy editing. With these articles, a cleanup template is usually added instead of a stub template. Note that if a small article has little properly sourced information, or if its subject has no inherent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article."


Wiki community considers stubs separate from clean-up articles....maybe we should but Incomplete under clean-up? or not, Wiki now classifies incompletes under clean-up category...comments on solutions?kalanosh 09:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools