Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Player Corporation Extended"
From Backstage Lore Wiki
(→Division to Second Template: Concurring) |
m (Protected "Template talk:Player Corporation Extended" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Personally I think that this template should not exist, and another template like 'Alliance History' which could be used in addition to [[Template:Player Corporation]] would work a lot better.--[[Contributor name:Ix Forres|Ix Forres]] 20:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | Personally I think that this template should not exist, and another template like 'Alliance History' which could be used in addition to [[Template:Player Corporation]] would work a lot better.--[[Contributor name:Ix Forres|Ix Forres]] 20:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I agree in general with this sentiment. I think this would be much better sucked into [[Template:Player Corporation]] with ParserFunctions to include alliance history if provided. A separate block for alliance information could also be quite useful. --[[Contributor name:Mariokoli Mianana|Mariokoli Mianana]] 20:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | :I agree in general with this sentiment. I think this would be much better sucked into [[Template:Player Corporation]] with ParserFunctions to include alliance history if provided. A separate block for alliance information could also be quite useful. --[[Contributor name:Mariokoli Mianana|Mariokoli Mianana]] 20:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Any objections to me updating pages using this template to [[Template:Player Corporation]] and [[Template:Alliance History]] then (Once the latter is created and approved)?--[[Contributor name:Ix Forres|Ix Forres]] 20:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Yes, major objections. 1. The grey style fits with the eve look and feel, 2. the extended one is far more complete and you would go deleting content (again), 3. the whole id-ing thing is nonsense, the idea with the evelopedia is to get content on the eve website not on an external website, 4. parser functions arent there (yet), 5. i personally dont like the over usage of images in the info box. This looks way more clean. [[Contributor name:DrAtomic|DrAtomic]] 00:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:39, 16 December 2008
Colors
This box should use the same colour scheme as the other templates. --Ix Forres 20:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Division to Second Template
Personally I think that this template should not exist, and another template like 'Alliance History' which could be used in addition to Template:Player Corporation would work a lot better.--Ix Forres 20:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree in general with this sentiment. I think this would be much better sucked into Template:Player Corporation with ParserFunctions to include alliance history if provided. A separate block for alliance information could also be quite useful. --Mariokoli Mianana 20:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Any objections to me updating pages using this template to Template:Player Corporation and Template:Alliance History then (Once the latter is created and approved)?--Ix Forres 20:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, major objections. 1. The grey style fits with the eve look and feel, 2. the extended one is far more complete and you would go deleting content (again), 3. the whole id-ing thing is nonsense, the idea with the evelopedia is to get content on the eve website not on an external website, 4. parser functions arent there (yet), 5. i personally dont like the over usage of images in the info box. This looks way more clean. DrAtomic 00:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Any objections to me updating pages using this template to Template:Player Corporation and Template:Alliance History then (Once the latter is created and approved)?--Ix Forres 20:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)